| Dear Debbie, In case Mr Carter or Mr Sweetland are unaware of my address, it is as follows:
4 Swan Green Sellindge Ashford Kent TN25 6EX
It would be convenient if all the information under the Freedom of Information Act I have requested is sent here. I have also asked Sharon Thompson, under the same Act, to send me all the information on the planning application which was started for a green waste facility in Hollingbourne a few years ago. Mrs Thompson will know which one I am referring to. It is the one started when the former leader of KCC was in office and Paul Carter was Deputy Leader. Both there people objected to the application, as did a Government Minister. It did not proceed any further, and I would like to know why, as it was not as detrimental to the local people as the development we have had foisted upon us. Also, I understand that a fellow member of the Sellindge Residents' Association, a qualified surveyor, has been asking for answers to technical questions concerning the Otterpool Quarry site, and he appears not to be receiving answers. If an Environmental Impact Assessment has been made, then the answers should have been easily given I would have thought. Perhaps, Debbie, you would be kind enough to look into this for us. Also, I am still waiting for Mr Sweetland to let us know how wide the stretch of the A20 is at its narrowest point, between Junction 11 of the M20 and the access to the Otterpool Quarry. I also asked for the width of both the Continental lorries and Countrystyle Developments' vehicles are. We will of course check the measurements given. I don't seem to be getting answers to these questions very easily. As part of the highways assessment, I would have thought these figures would be easily available, especially as it is predicted that there will be 43,000 extra vehicles on the road. KCC should also have taken into consideration that there are plans for residential expansion in Sellindge, and this will also mean more vehicles on the road, as well as the 40 cars Countrystyle Developments office staff will be using. There will be a lot of extra housing construction vehicles on the road whilst the Sellindge residential work will be going on. We are disappointed, although hardly surprised, that NOBODY from KCC will attend the meeting being held this evening to discuss what is happening to our village. It would have taken a lot of courage to face people here, and I do not think that anyone on the Council is up to it. Thanking you in anticipation of your help,
Dear Mrs Turton,
Thank you for your e-mails of 10 and 11 April addressed to Paul Carter, Leader of Kent County Council, and my sincere apologies for the delay in acknowledging receipt of them.
I understand you have also written on a number of occasions to Mr Carter's Cabinet Member for Environment, Highways and Waste, Bryan Sweetland, and that you are currently awaiting a reply to your latest e-mail of 28 April. To ensure all the questions you have raised in your recent communications to both Mr Carter and Mr Sweetland are answered accordingly, Mr Carter has asked Mr Sweetland to reply to your e-mail of 10 and 11 April on his behalf.
With reference to your FOI request, this has been passed to the Freedom of Information team who will reply to you in due course.
Thank you once again for taking the time to write to Mr Carter.
Kind regards Debbie
Mrs Debbie Horton PA to the Leader of Kent County Council __________________________________________ Room 1.75, Sessions House, County Hall, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 1XQ Tel: 01622 694283 Fax: 01622 694085 Please help to save paper by NOT printing this email unless absolutely necessary. P
From: Mavis Turton [mailto:mavis.turton@btinternet.com]
Sent: 10 April 2011 16:27
To: Carter, Paul - LEADER
Subject: RE: The KCC Planning Committee Meeting 15th March
| Dear Mr Carter, Thank you again for replying to my e mail. I note that you yourself are fighting an application by Countrystyle Developments to build a green waste only plant not far from your home. I wish you more success than we had, but as Ms Thompson said, these plants are not illegal, and as the proposed business is not nearly as bad as the one KCC granted near our home, so obviously, there will be no legal reason why the Planning Department will refuse it. I read MP Hugh Robertson's objection letter, and it seems that he is of the opinion that Hollingbourne, like Sellindge, has been blighted by the motorway and rail link, but our village has had much worse, and is being referred to now as "Smellindge" by the people we speak to in Ashford. Our village has not only had the rail and road links put on us, meaning that there are three bridges within yards of each other cutting the village in two, but we have as you know, the electricity converter station, with buildings so high they had to be sunk 30 feet into the ground otherwise they would be as prominent as Canterbury Cathedral. The 6 proposed wind turbines just on the edge of the village are as high as a football pitch is long. Then also, Shepway Council want to almost double the size of the village with more housing. You really would not want to live here Mr Carter. Then of course, there is the lorry park, to handle 3000 lorries during Operation Stack. Three years ago, I had to go to Bromley Hospital for a spinal operation, and the lorries were lined up for nearly half of the journey on the motorway, so the site at Aldngton will not be enough anyway. £40 million pounds for something which will not solve a problem which occurs no more than 3 or four times a year seems very bad value for money.
One of the reasons why I am writing this e mail to you, is that I wish, under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, to be given copies of ALL correspondence, letters to and from Countrystyle Developments, the Environment Agency, in all forms which concern the planning application for the Otterpool Quarry development, indeed everything which mentions it, covering the Highways Department, etc. I understand that you have no later than 20 working days to respond to my request.
Also, I have asked for information on why our Shepway District Councillor, Mrs Jennie Hollingsby, was totally unaware of the Planning Application for Otterpool Quarry, when she is Head of Planning for Shepway. The surrounding villages knew about it, but it took a local resident, out for a walk, who spotted the notice at the site entrance, to alert us all. As we have not been given a reason for this, I hope you will look into it for me.
Thanking you in anticipation that you will quickly address these matters, Kindest regards, Dear Mrs Turton
Thank you for your letter concerning the planning application for the waste facility at the Otterpool Quarry site in Sellindge. I know that the decision to grant planning permission was very unpopular and that there was strong local opposition to the development. The Planning Committee however had to assess all the planning considerations and planning law, which in this case included strong government and local planning support for waste and renewable energy development at the site.
I understand that you were at the Committee meeting and will be aware that the Committee considered the matter for nearly 3 hours and took into account a very detailed report that assessed all the planning considerations and local objections. This included the impact upon the local roads including the section you refer to. The Highway Authority were satisfied that the proposal was acceptable and that improvements other than those proposed at the site access were not necessary for the development to go ahead. Under these circumstances the Planning Authority cannot require any further works to be undertaken. The Committee also considered the alternative sites that the developer had assessed as part of the planning application and was satisfied that the study was acceptable and that no other site met the criteria needed for the proposed facility better than the Otterpool site.
I know that the Committee and my planning officers were very impressed in the way that local residents put forwarded their objections and that this assisted in the way that the application was considered and the planning conditions that are to be imposed. I also understand that you will be very disappointed by the decision, but hope that you recognise that the County Council has to make planning decisions in accordance with planning policy and law. Where it fails to do so, it places the Council at risk of its decisions being challenged and substantial costs being awarded against the Council.
Yours sincerely, Paul Carter Leader of Kent County Council
Please help to save paper by NOT printing this email unless absolutely necessary. P
From: Mavis Turton [mailto:mavis.turton@btinternet.com]
Sent: 17 March 2011 16:38
To: Carter, Paul - LEADER
Subject: The KCC Planning Committee Meeting 15th March
| Dear Mr Carter, Firstly, thank you for passing my letter, concerning the application of Countrystyle Developments, to build a waste plant in Sellindge, on to the committee. I was very surprised when they mentioned my letter at the meeting. Many Sellindge residents were present, and having sat through the three hours discussion, we were dismayed, although not surprised at the negative result, namely that permission was granted. It seemed to us all that the members of the committee were told how to vote right from the beginning, especially since their leader had her summing up all prepared in advance. This is a devastating blow to our village. An elderly lady was in tears because she now faces the passage of 168 lorries per day past her home, from 7am to 5 pm. The thing that I thought the application would fail on, is the one thing that was not discussed at the meeting, namely the unsuitability of the road between the M20 Junction 11 and Newingreen. This stretch of road is barely wide enough for one car and one lorry to pass each other, let alone two lorries. I would suggest that now planning has been granted, Countrystyle Developments should be made to undertake road widening at their own expense on this stretch of the road, including any purchase of land required to do so.
I was, to say the least, surprised when it was stated that 62 possible sites for this development had been considered, including the one that had first come to my mind when the development was announced, namely the huge, already poor land in Bad Munstereifel Avenue, (Orbital Industrial estate). It is beyond belief that this was discounted, because the site could provide much more accessibility being easily reached from both directions of the M20. This Ashford site could even have taken waste from Maidstone.
How much better than siting it in a village, opposite a thriving restaurant business, and disturbing the peace or a rural community.
I realise that you are very busy, but you were kind enough once to reply to me personally, and it would be nice if you could do so once more, Kindest regards, Mavis Turton
|
|
|
