Search This Site

Thursday, 28 July 2016


A mass demonstration will be taking place on Saturday, 6th August in Hythe.

If you are a Shepway or Ashford Resident and feel that you've had enough of our local Councils developing our communities without due consultation and acting against the wishes of local residents, please come along and support like minded residents.

We will be meeting at 10.30AM in Douglas Avenue(opposite Waitrose car park) to move off at 11am
Bring your drums, whistles and banners. We will be marching along the High Street and back along the ring road to finish at the High Street square to the rear of the ALDI store.

Groups being represented will include:
Princes Parade.
The Village Alliance Mersham.
Shornecliffe/Horn street areas:
The Lorry  Park:
Residents of West Hythe and Lympne:
Sevington/Cheesmans Green/Aldington/Mersham:


See you all on the 6th.

Monday, 25 July 2016



The British International Freight Association (BIFA) has added its voice to growing criticism of government plans to build a huge lorry park in Kent as an alternative solution to Operation Stack - the emergency procedure whereby freight lorries separate into two emergency queues on either side of the carriageway when the are problems with cross channel freight services.

Earlier this month, plans for a lorry park the size of Disneyland on the M20 were criticised by a House of Commons Select Committee that believes the government needs to justify the cost of the build.

Like the committee, BIFA also believes that the government has not clearly demonstrated what options have been evaluated and considers that the decision to proceed with a lorry park project in Kent had ignored some of the usual best practice when planning the expenditure of such large sums of money.

BIFA Director General, Robert Keen, says: "Our members' cross-channel trailer services are seriously impacted when there is disruption in the channel ports and Operation Stack comes into action. They are keen for the government to seek a solution to the disruption caused by Operation Stack, but query whether a lorry park is the best approach, given the cost and scale involved.

"It seems a little odd that such a significant amount of money might be spent on a lorry park that might never get used and might not even solve the wider problems.

"BIFA has always said there is not one single fix and a range of options should be considered, including consideration of the use of the M26 to queue rather than park traffic, upgrading of the A2 so that we've got two major routes to the port, as well as using smart technology.

"With an announcement expected on the way forward in summer 2016, BIFA members still feel that the government has more work to do to persuade us of the business case for this investment."

Saturday, 23 July 2016


Dear Residents,
It wouldn't have escaped your notice that we have absolutely no official voice when it comes to 'having our say' in the way our communities and villages are shaped and developed in the future.

This week, our District Council, Shepway, revealed the content of the Expression of Interest' document that has already been sent to central Government to develop a New Town of 12,000 houses. Prior to the 'Expression of Interest' being sent, the SDC Cabinet held a meeting on 8th June to vote on taking this development forward. It was no surprise to us that the vote was unanimous in favour. But isn't this democracy working for the good of the residents? It would be if all views were taken into consideration. Although minutes have been published for the Cabinet meeting  on the 8th June, the minutes for the Parish Councillors meeting  on the 7th June are nowhere to be found. If they do exist, could someone at SDC inform us. This was the meeting where Susan Priest, Alistair Stewart and David Monk invited 27 Parish Councillors to a presentation at the Civic Centre, hoping to get Parish Councils 'on board', backing the Otterpool New Town scheme. To say that it backfired would be an understatement. During open questions it was obvious that Parish Councillors were having none of it. We had Parish Councillors accusing David Monk of telling great untruths, charging Monk as being a master of obfuscation, culminating in a plea from a parish Councillor to take a vote to determine support for a New Town. Monk flatly refused. It was only then that a Monks Horton Parish Councillor took the initiative and clearly asked all Parish Councillors for a show of hands in Support of developing a New Town within our communities. Not one hand was raised. 
So, where are the minutes for this meeting ? A meeting where minutes should be published, but aren't. Where are the voices from Councillors that purport to represent residents' views? Councillor Hollingsbee - Where are you? Councillor Carey - Where are you? Damian Collins, our MP, Where are you?
Out of frustration with our so called representatives, S&DRA placed posters and banners in and around Sellindge to show our opposition to the proposed Otterpool New Town.  At great expense, these were purchased and duly placed around the area. Within a fortnight they had all been removed. 
Last Sunday morning 17th July, our team placed more posters around the area. By the very next day they had all been removed. Removed from residents fences, residents gardens and various post and signs. 
Removing any evidence of opposition to the Council's determination to build a Town in our area and stifling residents' views is reprehensible. A scenario that you think would only exist in certain African states. 
We are now adding  Borough Councillors' email addresses to our address book in the hope that support will come from outside of the Shepway area. Our plea to those Councillors would be to help in any way that you can to restore some kind of democracy here in Shepway. The message to our residents is also a plea to assist further in writing to the  local and National press. You have our permission to copy and paste this document to anyone, near or far to help us in our cause. 
Here we have three Councillors that should be serving local residents. Instead, they have an agenda which is totally alien to the wishes of local residents. Councillor Carey, Councillor and Deputy Leader SDC Hollingsbee and Leader of SDC David Monk.

These are the three Councillors that we would like to meet with to ask the real reason why they are so insistent on ignoring residents' views. Still, they are unwilling to meet with us. Below are their email addresses. Please email them and ask the simple question. 'Why are you so reluctant to meet with us to discuss your insistence on misrepresenting your constituents.
Should you receive a reply we would be grateful if you would copy us in with it.
Good luck,

Thursday, 21 July 2016


Dear Residents,


Shepway District Council have today released details of their 'Expression of Interest' recently submitted to central Government.

Here is a very brief summary as set out in the Kent and Sussex Courier.

Further details will be released on our next post.  Just click the link below:


Tuesday, 19 July 2016

Dear Residents, 

It would do no harm and may help if many of you could email the new cabinet, as I have, as soon as possible this week, to appeal for their intervention to stop this terrible waste of £250m on a monstrous lorry park unfit for purpose, which has been rushed through by their cabinet predecessors.
I suggest keeping it brief and to the point, including words to the effect of:
- waste of £250m allocated by Osborne in knee-jerk reaction
- ill- conceived and rushed proposal by HE
- carbuncle on the Garden of England
- catastrophic to the environment
- unprecedented and unknown air pollution - resulting 2.5 particulates could kill
- most importantly it won't fix stack (Eurotunnel, Port of Dover and even the TSC object to it)
- explain why whoever you are writing to could better use the money
- touch on the smarter options if you like
- impress on them how urgent this is as Statutory Consultation imminent

I've emailed the following on redirected addresses or online forms as instructed:
Theresa May,
Phillip Hammond,
Chris Grayling,
Jeremy Hunt,
Justine Greening,
Andrea Leadsom,
Michael Fallon,
Amber Rudd,
Sajid Javid,
Gavin Williamson,


Saturday, 16 July 2016


A protest march has been organised for the 6th August for residents to show their solidarity in opposing the Lorry Park, Otterpool New Town, Princes Parade and all developments in the Shornecliffe area. PLEASE KEEP YOUR DIARY CLEAR FOR THIS DAY. This will be a day to show central Government and Shepway District Council that enough is enough. Please watch this space for further details.


Sunday, 10 July 2016


Dear Residents,

Our friends at Shepwayvox have been profiling a member of the inner cabal at SDC. An interesting history. Please remember that the land purchased from Champney was purchased for the sole intention, as stated by SDC for an income stream from tenanted farmers. The thought of building a New Town never crossed their minds until shortly afterwards. So why was Susan Priest attending meetings as set out below prior to the land purchase??
Moreover, would Susan Priest be affected by the Lorry Park or Bonkersville? -  We don't think so. She doesn't even live in Shepway.


SDC's Corporate Director Dr Susan Priest's expenses 2015/16

by shepwayvox

Dr Susan Priest, (below) a product of St Catherine's College Cambridge, and also Shepway District Council's, Corporate Director for Strategic Operations, who earns between £105,000 and £108,000 per year according to the accounts, is a busy lady. She has been attending quite a few conferences/symposiums etc regarding Garden Villages/Towns in 2015.

(All information is taken from Dr Susan Priest's expenses for 2015/16 which are below)

Susan is the lead director on the Garden Village/Town project known as Otterpool Park. Susan is the Corporate Director responsible for negotiations (which are ongoing) with the Reuben Brothers owners of Folkestone Race Course via Arena Racing Corporation, which in turn is held offshore in the British Virgin Islands

Three months prior to the Election in 2015,  Policy Exchange, a neoconservative orientated think-tank with close ties to UK Prime Minister David Cameron, put this document  into the public arena.

Anyway, on Wednesday 8th July 2015 Policy Exchange  held a Symposium at the  Grange Wellington Hotel London  and Dr Susan Priest attends in the line of duty. The cost of this attendance to the Symposium in London was £354 (including VAT)

Grange Wellington Hotel London | 538 guest reviews, rates & photos ...

The Symposium is all about Increasing the Number of Available Homes

Two months later - the 15th September to be exact, Dr Susan Priest turns up at TCPA Conference: New Towns - past, present, future; which explored key delivery issues such as site designation, finance and governance, this conference will mark the publication of the final report of the TCPA's Study into lessons from the UK's New Towns and Garden Cities, and will provide an opportunity for learning and debate about the future delivery of large scale development in Britain. Recently 

In 2016, Susan then has quite a few meetings about the Garden Village, one of these is with the Landowners, who was at this meeting is not known,

Dr Priest like Alistair Stewart is in the habit of collecting clubcard points, we can't say if she collect Nectar points as these have been photocopied of the pages concerned. She  also collects Shell Petrol Loyalty Card points at our expense too.

Anyway here are Dr. Susan Priest expenses 2015-16 so you can see for yourself, what she has been up to.

Dr Susan Priest has in the past received a £170,000   payoff to to ease her departure from The South East England Development Agency (SEEDA). Her annual Salary in this position was £135,000

It is not known if Dr Susan Priest received any payment to ease her departure when she stepped down from the South East Local Enterprise Partnership to take up her Corporate Directorship with Shepway District Council. If you discover she did, please let us know, by emailing us at


shepwayvox | July 10, 2016 at 07:27 | Cate

Wednesday, 6 July 2016


Campaigners threaten legal action as transport secretary confirms Operation Stack lorry park to be built in Stanford

10:43 06 July 2016

Tom Pyman

Operation Stack

Operation Stack

Stanford residents and councillors, CPRE, FTA, KCC and Folkestone and Hythe MP Damian Collins have all reacted to the news

Share article from  Kent News on facebook 
Tweet article from  Kent News
Share article from  Kent News on Google Plus
post article from  Kent News on reddit
email article from  Kent News
Operation StackOperation Stack

Campaigners say they are threatening to take legal action after the transport secretary confirmed a major new lorry area will be created near Stanford as a long-term solution to the problems caused on the M20 and surrounding roads when Operation Stack is used.

The Stanford West site will be designed to hold around 3,600 lorries. Construction work will start as soon as possible with spaces available from summer 2017.

The aim is to help keep the M20 moving during disruption to cross-Channel services following the chaos caused last year.

However, it will spark fury among locals who opposed the plans.

Parish Council Chairman Matthew Webb at the proposed sites for a lorry park off the M20 to cater for Operation Stack Parish Council Chairman Matthew Webb at the proposed sites for a lorry park off the M20 to cater for Operation Stack

Patrick McLoughlin said: "Operation Stack is only ever used as a last resort but we recognise the impact it has on roads in Kent, and are determined to deliver an alternative solution.

"The new lorry area by the M20 will deliver better journeys for drivers and will not only support the region's economy but also businesses as far away as Scotland that rely on the M20 to access the Port of Dover and the Channel Tunnel.

"We have committed up to £250m for the lorry area and we are now making it a reality."

The government is exploring using the site for overnight parking of lorries, relieving pressure caused by some drivers parking in unsuitable or illegal locations.

STOP 24 at Junction 11 of the M20 - campaigners would prefer to see it extended rather than build a new lorry parkSTOP 24 at Junction 11 of the M20 - campaigners would prefer to see it extended rather than build a new lorry park

The lorry area will provide parking for up to 3,600 lorries. A Highways England consultation showed strong support for a permanent lorry area to reduce or remove the need to close the M20.

Nearly twice as many people thought it should be located at Stanford West than those who thought it should be built at an alternative site to the north of junction 11, because, among other reasons, it would have been close to an area of outstanding natural beauty.

The proposed site is west of the M20 junction 11 at Stanford West. Balfour Beatty has already been appointed as the lead contractor for the project.

New entry and exit slip roads will be built on the eastbound carriageway, providing direct access to the lorry park.

Jim O'Sullivan, Highways England chief executive said: "The secretary of state has asked us to progress a lorry area between Sellindge and Stanford. Direct access from the M20 means less lorries using local roads.

"We will work closely with residents and local stakeholders to ensure the design of the new lorry area minimises its social and environmental impact, while meeting the wider need to address this issue for Kent and the UK."

More than 1,000 drivers, residents and workers attended eight public events during the consultation on the lorry park and nearly 1,300 people provided written responses to the proposals.

The majority of people supported the idea of creating a new lorry area, with less than a quarter thinking Operation Stack should continue in its current form.

The next stage of the project will involve consulting on the details and the environmental impact of the scheme. That consultation will open shortly.

However, the proposals were criticised not just locally but by shipping form Motis and the British International Freight Association (BIFA), and perhaps most pertinently, by a House of Commons transport select committee.

A report published last month found that the decision to proceed was rushed in reaction to the events of the summer of 2015 when Stack was used longer than ever before.

The committee called on transport ministers to demonstrate the necessity of building the lorry park, including the cost-benefit ratios of alternative solutions and whether the park is proportionate and appropriate to the scale and frequency of disruption.

It also stressed the need to factor in environmental and social costs on the locality, economic benefits and the long-terms costs of operating, maintaining, renewing and, eventually, decommissioning the lorry park.

Matthew Webb, the chairman of Stanford Parish Council is furious and is planning legal action to overturn the decision.

He told us: "It is no real surprise. We are very disappointed - we have been opposing this from the start and will continue to do so.

"We are disappointed the government and secretary of state has not done anything to address concerns raised by the transport select committee in their report saying they don't believe the case has been made for a lorry park.

"So we will continue to campaign to oppose it. We must try and we know it will be difficult. We have taken legal counsel and will try to oppose it in other ways."

Alternative solutions mooted by those in opposition included several smaller lorry parks, use of the M26 motorway for queuing lorries and even the Brands Hatch race track in the north of the county, though that idea was emphatically quashed by bosses.

Debbie Burton of the campaign group SOS (Smarter Options than Stanford) Kent added: "I'm shellshocked, but as far as I'm concerned the fight is not over.

"We will get together soon to see what the next steps we can take will be.

"I thought they had to respond to the select committee but from what I have seen and heard, they haven't.

"Does this make a mockery of the select committee? I don't know."

Hilary Newport, director of CPRE Kent, also reacted angrily to the news, having frequently travelled to Westminster in recent months as part of campaigning against the lorry park.

She told us: "I'm very surprised it's happened so quickly, I didn't think anything would happen before we got a new prime minister.

"It's the wrong solution to the wrong problem - the Port of Dover are demanding money spent on maximising their availability through the M2/A2 corridor.

"And if their ambitions go ahead, this lorry park is in the wrong place, as is the proposed Thames crossing east of Gravesend.

"It's the worst of all possible outcomes and they've made me very cross - it's a complete failure of integrated transport planning."

Ms Newport was also full of praise for campaigners like Ms Burton and Cllr Webb.

"There is a lot of local opposition and they have been incredibly sensible and have acknowledged that it's a problem," she said.

"They've already got Stop24 in their backyard, so it's not fair and completely disingenuous to say they are NIMBYs.

"The vast majority of implementations of Stack last 10-15 hours and we usually have 200 lorries arriving in that queue.

"A lorry park that would cater for about 80 per cent of instances would be a fraction of the size of this - Stop24 and other areas could be expanded quite easily.

"Last year was dreadful but it was unique and we have so much in place now to stop it ever happening again.

"It's just a knee-jerk reaction that it is leading to the destruction of huge swathes of open space.

"It will be such a blot on the landscape - the motorway and railway integrates into it quite well, but this will be impossible to shield."

The announcement was supported by Kent County Council, however, with cabinet member for environment and transport, Matthew Balfour, saying: "I'm pleased the government has agreed to a site and is moving quickly with constructing this permanent lorry holding area.

"For years we have argued that a solution to the problem of Operation Stack – blighting not only Kent's residents and businesses but much of the UK – needs to be considered, and this is a culmination of that work.

"Last year's Stack had an estimated cost to the Kent and Medway economy of around £1.45m a day and across the country it was estimated to be about £250m a day.

"We will continue to support the government and Highways England in ensuring the lorry area is operational as soon as possible.

"We fully intend to support property owners in Stanford during this process.

"Alongside appropriate environmental mitigation measures, we believe residents should be quickly and fully compensated for the loss of property value and inability to sell if they need or want to move."

The Tunbridge Wells-based Freight Transport Association also felt the park was the most practical solution to ending misery on the roads of the county.

Head of policy for London and the south east, Natalie Chapman, said: "FTA has been pressing for a permanent solution to the problems caused by Operation Stack so we're delighted that the new lorry area could be ready by next summer.

"This will end the misery for thousands of residents and businesses whose lives have been repeatedly disrupted by Operation Stack on the M20, especially last summer when it was implemented 32 times.

"However, the design of the lorry site is crucial to ensure that trucks can be quickly moved to the port and Eurotunnel as soon as capacity is available.

"Of course, we would rather avoid Operation Stack altogether and keep the wheels of industry turning, so it is important that the lorry park doesn't become out of sight, out of mind - we still need to tackle the causes.

"It would be a bonus if the site could accommodate overnight lorry parking as this is also a serious problem in the county.

"However, this must not be at the cost of the smooth-running of the site for Operation Stack."

Despite some local opposition, Shepway District Council was also supportive, with Conservative leader David Monk insisting the importance of keeping the M20 open in both directions when lorries cannot cross the Channel, and ensuring local roads are not used either for diversions or parking to minimise impact on residents.

He said: "We welcome today's announcement by the secretary of state that Highways England will be providing a lorry storage area at Stanford West as a step towards dealing with the misery of Operation Stack.

"We will now consider the details of the announcement and make sure that it meets these criteria but we are really pleased that the government have listened to us about the need to provide a solution that works for the people and businesses of Shepway."

Damian Collins, MP for Folkestone and Hythe added: "I have always been clear that Kent should never again have to suffer from the kind of scenes witnessed last summer, which caused misery to people's lives and cost Kent businesses millions of pounds in lost revenue.

"The plan to build a lorry park to hold around 3,600 lorries is the best way to achieve this.

"I firmly believe that this announcement is a step forward for the constituency and the rest of the county."

Police and crime commissioner Matthew Scott was supportive of the proposals prior to his election, as reported by Kent News, and has also welcomed today's news.

"Operation Stack is a coordinated multi-agency response implemented when there is disruption to cross-Channel traffic," he said.

"It is only ever used as a last resort but when that does happen, it brings significant disruption to Kent's roads and is a huge inconvenience to local people.

"Thanks to the hard work of local MPs, last year Operation Stack was identified as a national issue, not just a local one for us here in Kent.

"Any measure which can help prevent Operation Stack or reduce the impact of any disruption in future is to be welcomed which is why I'm pleased that a decision has been made on where a relief lorry park should go and that construction on the project will be able to proceed."

Mr Scott and his office will also continue to discuss with government any options for Kent Police receiving additional funding for its role in implementing Operation Stack.

He added: "We also need to continue to look at any other options which could direct lorries away from Kent's busy roads.

Sunday, 3 July 2016

Dear Residents,

Our friends at Shepwayvox have information that they would like to share. Those of you who are not signed up for their regular updates, just follow the instruction on their site. 

Another reminder for residents that are not signed in to S&DRA, please ask neighbours and friend to contact us. Our email address is on our website.

Here be the Shepwayvox link



The articles contained in this website are for general informational purposes only and have been provided by various sources including the public, newspaper content and local bodies. These articles are then presented by Sellindge & District Residents Association on this website, and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.

Through this website you are able to link to other websites which are not under the control of Sellindge & District Residents Association. We have no control over the nature, content and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.

Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, Sellindge & District Residents Association takes no responsibility for, and will not be liable for, the website being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues beyond our control. This website may include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. The Sellindge & District Residents Association has no business relationship with any organisations mentioned in this website.