Search This Site

Saturday 1 January 2011

Anaerobic Digester - democracy? - KCC worried about cost - away from people

From: brain37@live.co.uk
To: npcu@gowm.gsi.gov.uk
Subject: Re: Anaerobic Digester, Sellindge, Kent (Tara Dickenson).
Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 21:23:36 +0100

Thank you for your letter of the 28th April, concerning the Anaerobic Digester in Sellindge, Kent.

With respect, what annoys me about this whole episode is the way that the planning for the Digester was passed. We are supposed to live in a democracy and if there is a case where this has been ignored then this is it. Our government is quick to get involved with international problems such as Iraq and Libya, where it has the audacity to preach democracy. When we get a problem in this country everyone in authority just looks the other way. How can it be called a democracy when 2000 people, four parish councils, our local district council, MP and county councillor are against the scheme but it is allowed just because a hand full of people at Kent County Hall agree to it? This is absolutely immoral and virtually a dictatorship. As I said in my letter, at least two of the planning committee were asleep during the debate?

The Planning Officer for KCC stated during the meeting that if the application is rejected it will cost the Council a lot of money when the applicants appeal. What should have happened is that the applicants Countrystyle Developments, should have been told that there is too much opposition to planning being granted and that they should look for a site away from a residential area. All that KCC were worried about was the cost to them and not the welfare of the residents in Sellindge. I always ask the question, would you like to have an Anaerobic Digester in the locality where you live; of course the answer will always be NO?

Most of the residents from Sellindge who attended the meeting were elderly, people who have worked all of their lives and contributed Tax and National Insurance all this time. They religiously pay their house tax and in many cases have fought for this country or like me, did compulsory military service and faced Hitler's bombs during the war. What happens, we get kicked in the teeth just so that a few people can make money at our expense? There was no consideration about the attitudes and welfare of the local people and our government goes on preaching to other countries.

In you letter you said that the PM and Minister has to delegate to the Civil Servants but we elect the former and not the latter. When the elections are due they soon start appealing to us for our support. In deed, I have have received many letters through the email asking for such support with AV. All the people of Sellindge want is to live in a nice environment and not have to put up with 100 lorries a day delivering waste food to a site on the edge of the village in the path of the prevailing wind. If the Digester process is so vital then why doesn't the KCC allow it to be built in another part of the countryside that is away from any residents? There is ample space available as we live a farming county.

Finally, a few years ago Countrystyle applied to build a waste disposal plant in Hollingbourne near Maidstone. This Plant was very close to where the Leader of Kent County Council lived. The result was that the MP Hugh Robertson, Leader of KCC Sir Sandy Bruce Lockhart and the present Leader Paul Carter were dead against it. Mr Robertson stated that he was concerned about the impact on the landscape, the smell, large vehicle movement and the need to conserve the Kent countryside, which he reinforced as being the Garden of England. He said that Hollingbourne had already suffered enough through the introduction of the M20 and the High Speed Rail Link. All of these apply to Sellindge.

Will you therefore approach Mr Eric Pickles and ask him to intervene on our behalf and not just contact us the voters, when he needs support?

Thank you.

Fred Turton.

PS. In your letter you said that a copy of the planning decision notice was attached. It was not included.  

  

Disclaimer

The articles contained in this website are for general informational purposes only and have been provided by various sources including the public, newspaper content and local bodies. These articles are then presented by Sellindge & District Residents Association on this website, and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.

Through this website you are able to link to other websites which are not under the control of Sellindge & District Residents Association. We have no control over the nature, content and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.

Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, Sellindge & District Residents Association takes no responsibility for, and will not be liable for, the website being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues beyond our control. This website may include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. The Sellindge & District Residents Association has no business relationship with any organisations mentioned in this website.