Providing you with regular updates on Anaerobic Waste, Shepway Housing, Lorry Parks and Wind farms affecting our village and community.
Search This Site
Thursday, 27 October 2011
Updates for 7th to 22nd October 2011
Section 3 - Otterpool Waste treatment
1) Update/Reply from Environmental Agency to Susan Carey email re Environmental Permit application from Countrystyle Recycling - 19 October 2011
Section 4 - Wind Farm
1) Two Wind Anemometer Masts erected Harringe Brooks - 20 October 2011
2) Harringe Brooks Wind Anemometer Mast - 20 October 2011
Section 6 - Shepway - Housing/Village Green
1) Parish Council response to Shepway LDF and Sellindge Masterplan
Section 8 - Kent Mineral and Waste Sites Development - Consultation
1) Mineral and Waste Sites Development Plan Documents - Supplementary Options Consultation commencing on Monday 24 October 2011
Section 9 - Correspondence including replies from KCC
1) Letter to Mr Cameron - People must not have policies forced on them from above - 7 October 2011
2) Abolish the County Councils? - 9 october 2011
3) Reorganise local government? - response from Eric Pickles - 11 October 2011
Monday, 3 October 2011
Wind turbine bid is thrown out by district Council
Once finished, click on the back-arrow at the top left of the screen to return to the website and then navigate your way around as usual. Use the 'Home' page link in Section 1 to return to the start if you prefer.
Decision on revised Bernhurst Planning Application
Sent: 22 December 2012 08:01
Subject: Saved search results and Tracked Applications have been updated
Ref. No: Y12/1013/SH | Status: Approved with conditions | Case Type: Application
Message of thanks to the Councillors from Anthony Bosley - Chairman SALVATION
Sunday, 2 October 2011
Shepway Decision re Barrow Hill Wind Turbine Application
Shepway Decision - Planning Application Notification: Y12/0241/SH - Land Adjoining Somerfield Court Farm Barrow Hill
Once finished reading, return to the original tab and navigate the website as normal.
Barrow Hill Turbine Rejected
Barrow Hill Turbine Rejected
Once finished reading, return to the original tab and navigate the website as normal.
Saturday, 1 October 2011
Shepway Core Strategy Local Plan - Proposed Modifications Autumn 2012 available to view and comment up to 10th December
Subject: Shepway District Council: New event available
Shepway Core Strategy Local Plan - Proposed Modifications Autumn 2012 will be available for you to view and comment between the following dates:
Start date: 29/10/12 09:00
End date: 10/12/12 17:00
Please select the following link (which will open in a new tab) to view this event:
http://consult.shepway.gov.uk/portal/shepway_cslp_propmods2012
microlight aircraft runway - turbine concern?
Sent: 04 December 2012 18:43
Subject: Fw: Wind turbines
Mavis
From: "Leader@shepway.gov.uk" <Leader@shepway.gov.uk>
To: mavis.turton@btinternet.com
Sent: Tuesday, 4 December 2012, 10:46
Subject: RE: Wind turbines
Sent: 04 December 2012 09:25
To: Leader
Subject: Re: Wind turbines
Dear Mr Bliss,
To: mavis.turton@btinternet.com
Sent: Wednesday, 7 November 2012, 14:19
Subject: RE: Wind turbines
Cllr Robert Bliss
Leader of the Council
Sent: 19 October 2012 13:17
To: Bliss, Robert Cllr
Subject: Wind turbines
Dear Mr Bliss,
we have friends who live in
West Lothian, Scotland. They tell me that there are wind turbines in
East Lothian, in the Lammermuir Hills. They say that a man was killed
when he was hit by ice, which was thrown off the turbine blades during cold
weather.
Notwithstanding the danger
to people, there is a distinct danger of damage to property when the turbines
are so near residential buildings. The proposed turbines in our area
seem to be sited at an unacceptable distance from peoples homes, and
considering their position on the edge of the Romney Marsh, a very damp
position, I would think that the turbine blades could become iced up, and
would cause problems.
I have tried to contact the
East Lothian Courier newspaper, which I believe serves the area, but I am
having trouble doing this. Perhaps you would be more successful.
It is quite important I would think, to find out exactly what happened in the
Lammermuir Hills.
Kind regards,
Mavis Turton
|
Additional information received re Single Wind Turbine on land adjoining Somerfield Court Farm Planning Application
Proposal
|
Erection of a single wind
turbine measuring 44.28m to hub height and a maximum of 61m to blade tip
height, together with construction of an access track, a crane pad and an
equipment housing cabinet.
|
Location
|
Land Adjoining Somerfield
Court Farm, Barrow Hill, Sellindge, Kent
|
Job Done on Wind Farms says John Hayes
Job Done on Wind Farms says John Hayes.... click on the link below to read more (it will open in a new tab)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9676256/Job-done-on-wind-farms-says-John-Hayes.html
Once finished reading, return to the original tab and navigate the website as normal.
Wind Farms by Andrew Gilligan in the Sunday Telegraph 4th November 2012
Sent: 04 November 2012 11:55
Subject: Wind Farms by Andrew Gilligan in the Sunday Telegraph 4th November 2012
The following copied from The Sunday Telegraph today......
Regards
========================================================================
ENVIRONMENT
Wind farm noise does harm sleep and health, say scientists
Study warns of ‘clear and significant dangers’ as EU demands more renewables, writes Andrew Gilligan
WIND farm noise causes “clear and significant” damage to people’s sleep and mental health, according to the first full peer-reviewed scientific study of the problem.
American and British researchers compared two groups of residents in the US state of Maine. One group lived within a mile of a wind farm and the second group did not.
Both sets of people were demographically and socially similar, but the researchers found major differences in the quality of sleep the two groups enjoyed.
The findings provide the clearest evidence yet to support long-standing complaints from people living near turbines that the sound from their rotating blades disrupts sleep patterns and causes stress-related conditions.
The study will be used by critics of wind power to argue against new turbines being built near homes and for existing ones to be switched off or have their speed reduced, when strong winds cause their noise to increase.
The researchers used two standard scientific scales, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, which measures the quality of night-time sleep, and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, which measures how sleepy people feel when they are awake.
“Participants living near industrial wind turbines had worse sleep, as evidenced by significantly greater mean PSQI and ESS scores," the researchers, Michael Nissenbaum, Jeffery Aramini and Chris Hanning, found.
“There were clear and significant dose-response relationships, with the effect diminishing with increasing log-distance from turbines."
The researchers also tracked respondents’ “mental component scores” and found a “significant” link – probably caused by poor-quality sleep – between wind turbines and poorer mental health.
More than a quarter of participants in the group living near the turbines said they had been medically diagnosed with depression or anxiety since the wind farm started. None of the participants in the group further away reported such problems.
Each person was also asked if they had been prescribed sleeping pills. More than a quarter of those living near the wind farm said they had. Less than a tenth of those living further away had been prescribed sleeping pills.
According to the researchers, the study, in the journal Noise and Health, is the first to show clear relationships between wind farms and “important clinical indicators of health, including sleep quality, daytime sleepiness and mental health”.
Unlike some common forms of sleep-disturbing noise, such as roads, wind turbine noise varies dramatically, depending on the wind direction and speed. Unlike other forms of variable noise, however, such as railways and aircraft, it can continue for very long periods at a time. The nature of the noise – a rhythmic beating or swooshing of the blades – is also disturbing. UK planning guidance allows a night-time noise level from wind farms of 42 decibels – equivalent to the hum made by a fridge.
This means that turbines cannot be built less than 380-550 yards from human habitation, with the exact distance depending on the terrain and the size of the turbines.
However, as local concern about wind farm noise grows, many councils are now drawing up far wider cordons. Wiltshire, for instance, has recently voted to adopt minimum distances of between 0.6 to 1.8 miles, depending on the size of the turbines.
Dr Lee Moroney, director of planning at the Renewable Energy Foundation, said: “The UK noise limits were drawn up 16 years ago, when wind turbines were less than half the current size. Worse still, the guidelines permit turbines to be built so close to houses that wind turbine noise will not infrequently be clearly audible indoors at night time, so sleep impacts and associated health effects are almost inevitable.
“This situation is obviously unacceptable and creating a lot of angry neighbours, but the industry and government response is slow and very reluctant. Ministers need to light a fire under their civil servants."
The research will add to the growing pressure on the wind farm industry, which was attacked last week by the junior energy minister, John Hayes, for the way in which turbines have been “peppered around the country without due regard for the interests of the local community or their wishes”. Saying “enough is enough”, Mr Hayes appeared to support a moratorium on new developments beyond those already in the pipeline.
He was slapped down by his Lib Dem boss, Ed Davey, the Energy Secretary, but is unlikely to have made his remarks without some kind of nod from the top of Government. George Osborne, the Chancellor, is known to be increasingly sceptical about the effectiveness of wind power, which is heavily subsidised but delivers relatively little reduction in carbon dioxide.
Wind farms generate about a quarter of their theoretical capacity because the wind does not always blow at the required speeds. Earlier this year, more than 100 Tory MPs urged David Cameron to block the further expansion of wind power.
Whatever the Government decides, however, may not matter.
The Telegraph has learnt that the EU will shortly begin work on a new directive which may impose a binding target for further renewable energy, mostly wind, on the UK. There is already a target, which is also Government policy, that 20 per cent of energy should come from renewables by 2020.
But Brussels is considering imposing an even higher mandatory target to be met over the following decade, according to Gunther Oettinger, the EU energy commissioner. “I want an interesting discussion on binding targets for renewables by 2030," he said earlier this year.
Two weeks ago, a senior member of his staff, Jasmin Battista, said that Mr Oettinger was “open to” forced targets, though no decision had been made.
The European Parliament has voted for mandatory increases in renewables by 2030 and Mr Davey has also said he favours them. The issue will be considered at a European Council of Ministers meeting next month.
Wind Turbines - Ice build up on the turbine blade mitigation measures
To: mavis.turton
Sent: Wednesday, 7 November 2012, 14:19
Subject: RE: Wind turbines
Leader of the Council
Shepway District Council, Civic Centre
Sent: 19 October 2012 13:17
To: Bliss, Robert Cllr
Subject: Wind turbines
Dear
Mr Bliss,
we
have friends who live in West Lothian, Scotland. They tell me that
there are wind turbines in East Lothian, in the Lammermuir Hills. They
say that a man was killed when he was hit by ice, which was thrown off the
turbine blades during cold weather.
Notwithstanding
the danger to people, there is a distinct danger of damage to property when
the turbines are so near residential buildings. The proposed turbines
in our area seem to be sited at an unacceptable distance from peoples homes,
and considering their position on the edge of the Romney Marsh, a very damp
position, I would think that the turbine blades could become iced up, and
would cause problems.
I
have tried to contact the East Lothian Courier newspaper, which I believe
serves the area, but I am having trouble doing this. Perhaps you would
be more successful. It is quite important I would think, to find out
exactly what happened in the Lammermuir Hills.
Kind
regards,
Mavis
Turton
|
Hearing by Shepway re Single Wind Turbine at Somerfield Court farm, Barrow Hill
1) Flyer - 11th Dec is D-Day
2) Document being presented to members of Shepway Planning Control Committee by the SALVATION Action Group
3) Officer's Report for Single Wind Turbine - Somerfield Court Farm
4) Somerfield Court Farm Wind Turbine Application - to be heard before Shepway Councillors Tuesday 11th December
New Lympne Consultation for 250 Houses
- Monday 19th November - 5pm to 8pm - at Lympne C of E Primary School
- Tuesday 20th November - 2pm to 5pm - at Lympne Village Hall
Further details can be found by checking the following website (note - the website will open in a new tab):
Lympne Consultation
Once finished then return to this tab and navigate the website as usual.
Single Wind Turbine on land adjoining Somerfield Court Farm, Barrow Hill - Document being presented to members of Shepway Planning Control Committee by the SALVATION Action Group
local views - Impact of Single Turbine on land adjoining Somerfield Court Farm, Barrow Hill
BernHurst revised Planning Application Y12/1013/SH
Reference : Y12/1013/SH
Address : Bern Hurst, Barrow Hill, Sellindge, Ashford.
Proposal : Erection of 5 detached two-storey dwellings to rear of existing retained dwelling, with associated access road, integral and freestanding car ports, and parking spaces (resubmission of application Y12/0998/SH)
The full details can be found on the Shepway Plannign website, or click on the links below which will take you straight there.... (note - each will open in a new tab)
Details:
http://searchplanapps.shepway.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=MCTCFGNZ03J00
Associated documents/maps
http://www.ukplanning.com/ukp/findCaseFile.do?councilName=Shepway+District+Council&appNumber=Y12/1013/SH&action=Search
The Updates for week commencing 24th September 2011 are.....
Note - Older (pre-July 2011) information has been archived to the same named Section (prefixed with 'old') lower down in the right-hand column.
Section 7 - Sellindge Convertor Station - including application number
1) National Grid Converter Station - Notification of decision 'letter'
2) A Copy of the letter referred to above re the planning application
Section 8 - Correspondence including replies from KCC
1) Photos and emails re the disgraceful 'Pavements' on the A20
2) National Trust Planning for People campaign - Planning for people - your views?
3) English Countryside under threat - petition from '38 degrees'
Illegal waste operations result in £233,670 fine for Kent firms and director
Waste firm fined over illegal dumping of 'soil'
Once finished reading the above, click on the back-arrow in the top left of the screen to return to the website and then navigate your way around as usual.
Lympne Airfield Developers accused of 'bamboozling' villagers
Once finished, click on the back-arrow at the top left of the screen to return to the website and then navigate your way around as usual. Use the 'Home' page link in Section 1 to return to the start if you prefer.
Somerfiled Court Farm Wind Turbine Application - to be heard before Shepway Councillors on Tuesday 11th December
Officer's Report for the Single Turbine Y12/0241/SH - Somerfiled Court Farm, Barrow Hill
'Officer's Report for the Single Turbine Planning Application ref. Y12/0241/SH on Land Adjoining Somerfiled Court Farm, Barrow Hill, Sellindge - Erection of a single wind turbine, togehter with construction of an access track, a crane, a crane pad and an equipment housing cabinet':
Officer's Report for Single Turbine Y12/0241/SH at Somerfield Court Farm, Barrow Hill
Disclaimer
The articles contained in this website are for general informational purposes only and have been provided by various sources including the public, newspaper content and local bodies. These articles are then presented by Sellindge & District Residents Association on this website, and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.
Through this website you are able to link to other websites which are not under the control of Sellindge & District Residents Association. We have no control over the nature, content and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, Sellindge & District Residents Association takes no responsibility for, and will not be liable for, the website being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues beyond our control. This website may include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. The Sellindge & District Residents Association has no business relationship with any organisations mentioned in this website.